Charles Woodson

[Lash]

At what point does he retire as a packer and not a raider? Is there any question that he's had a more impressive career as a packer? The only thing that ties his career to the raiders in the length of time that he played for them, which his career with the packers is closing in on every day.

Message posted using Tapatalk.

[GTSLOW]

Not sure how the whole retirement thing works. But he will be remember as his best days obviously with the packers. Also no doubt he'll want his name with us at the end for good.

What him and collins did with the secondary last year was amazing.

[spooln30]

I think he's got a couple more years left. He played great tonight as well as our entire defense. That's how the defense needs to play every game here on out.

[moels]

85% of the world is covered by water.......the rest is covered by Charles Woodson.

[Prince Valiant]

If the Pack win another superbowl, I think it'd be pretty much a given. Perhaps if he wins another NFL defensive player of the year award, it might be a given too.

[PB86MCSS]

A couple more stellar seasons and he might be HOF bound, the early career injuries hurt but revived with the Packers, that is how he will be remembered.

[Car Guy]

85% of the world is covered by water.......the rest is covered by Charles Woodson.

:rolf

[GHOSST]

Packer hands down. With the Raiders all he has is a Rookie of Year award, a couple Pro Bowls, some impressive numbers, and slew of bad injuries. His time with the Raiders is a skid mark on his career path compared to his time with the Packers.

The only way I see him retiring as a Raider is if he chooses the first team he played for like that's were he started his path to greatness with all he learned. But I say it would be wiser for him to go out with the team were he had all his greatness, and were he got his ring (hopefully and 's behind that soon) and respect as a team leader.

[GHOSST]

But check this out, look how impressive he is in GB compared to his time in OAK, hands down his career really started at GB.


Year Team G INT Yards TD Sacks FF
1998 OAK 16 5 118 1 0 2
1999 OAK 16 1 15 1 0 0
2000 OAK 16 4 36 0 0 3
2001 OAK 16 1 64 0 1.0 1
2002 OAK 8 1 3 0 0 4
2003 OAK 15 3 67 0 1.0 1
2004 OAK 13 1 25 0 2.5 2
2005 OAK 6 1 0 0 0 1
2006 GB 16 8 61 1 1.0 3
2007 GB 14 4 48 1 0 0
2008 GB 16 7 169 2 3.0 1
2009 GB 16 9 179 3 2.0 4
2010 GB 16 2 48 1 2.0 5
2011 GB 7 5 62 1 1.0 0
Total N/A 191 50 895 11 14.5 27

[The Shaolin]

I'm not sure what you're asking. Retiring as a ___ has really no bearing on anything. When Chuck enters the hall of fame, it will list every team he played for.

As far as I know, the only reason people retire as a ____ is for the hell of it. Woodson will retire as a Packer, he won't go anywhere else this late in his career.

Antonio Freeman bounced around to a few teams after leaving Green Bay, never made much of an impact, then signed a 1 day contract to retire as a Packer, because his career was mostly here.