392 Challenger

[nismodave]

45k+ for 13 flat in the 1/4?? :alcoholic :rolleyes:

Looks cool tho!

qKcZaVH_x3E

[Prince Valiant]

this one w/ an auto went 12.44:

http://www.streetfire.net/video/2011-challenger-392-hemi-1240-stock_2089181.htm

[Reverend Cooper]

I will believe that on the auto when its inspected

[lilws6]

So they packed more ponys under the hood reworked suspension and its still a pig? i don't have $45k into my car yet and it runs 13's lol

[Reverend Cooper]

my 5000 lb truck ran 13s lol

[DRK]

13.0 @ 111.3 MPH
0-60 in 4.6 Sec
60-0 in 117 FT
.89 Lateral Gs

Not bad for a 4260lb barge but a joke for a $45K muscle/sports car. I think these are a disgrace to the 1st gen cars. Oh wait they where fat, slow, and couldn't stop or turn either.

[Prince Valiant]

I will believe that on the auto when its inspected
well, apparently the auto's are just quicker...insideline.com got a 12.6 @ 112.1 with theirs (http://www.insideline.com/dodge/challenger/2011/2011-dodge-challenger-srt8-392-full-test.html).

[HITMAN]

well, apparently the auto's are just quicker...insideline.com got a 12.6 @ 112.1 with theirs (http://www.insideline.com/dodge/challenger/2011/2011-dodge-challenger-srt8-392-full-test.html).

Easier to launch. Sticks are for road racing and having fun farting around. Autos are for drag racing and when you get tired of losing races because your stick set-up and your launch technique and shifting ability aren't perfect. Plus, the Motor Tend guys aren't exactly noted for their drag racing skills. I'd like to see what the 6M Chal could do with a set of drag radials and a guy like Evan Smith behind the wheel. At least before that 4200+lb tub spit out it's half-shafts... :wow