5th gen camaro

[Ricky Bobby]

http://www.popularhotrodding.com/features/0312PHR_Fifth_Reloaded/

[Al]

But will it happen???

Step one... get rid of the ss-r.

[SMS 1]

Now this is more like what Im talkin about! :banana :banana :banana Time to wake from the coma GM!!! C'Mon General put that friggin SSR heap out to pasture and roll some of these out :thumbsup

[Ricky Bobby]

heck ya i reall like the lines of it :hump2:

[T-Bag]

I actually saw this about a year ago, honestly I dont think it's going to happen. It looks cool but the rear looks way too much like a vette.

[GTSLOW]

Its got hints of a vette rear but thats it. That car is AWSOME! I agree dump that overweight ss-r and hello 5th gen camaro1

[SlowStee]

u silly dreamers

[Ricky Bobby]

its ok to dream isnt it :banana

[Al]

I agree dump that overweight ss-r and hello 5th gen camaro1

And underpowered

[Syclone0044]

To think that GM would release something that's cool looking, FAST, and affordable, you'd have to be dreaming...

[FiErO-5spd]

Man, how could they do this to the F-Body's. They take something great like a Camaro, and something Great like a Vette, put them together, and IT LOOKS LIKE A FRICKIN CHRYSLER!!! ITS SO UGLY! BTW i'm in school and about 5 other people say the same thing... 5th Gen, they could make better... :wtf

[Sexy83TA]

If you ask me, their combinine the vette and the look of the '69 Camaro.

I don't like it at all.

[jbiscuit]

I like it...way better than the ss-r....I think the ss-r is the biggest flop. That thing sux!

[PB86MCSS]

I agree it looks like a mix between the Vette and 1st gen Camaro but does look pretty good. Seems just too expensive for some reason the way it looks, not sure why. The key is to have the car affordable, not over 30k for a V-8 model or something :rolleyes: . Wish the GTO was even cheaper of course, muscle is meant to be affordable :).

[SMS 1]

Man, how could they do this to the F-Body's. They take something great like a Camaro, and something Great like a Vette, put them together, and IT LOOKS LIKE A FRICKIN CHRYSLER!!! ITS SO UGLY! BTW i'm in school and about 5 other people say the same thing... 5th Gen, they could make better... :wtfI will agree that the rear end on this thingdoes make it look a little Chrysler-esque but the rest of it is pure 1st GEN Camaro IMO. Just as long as they don't start trying to make it look like a 1980 Berlinetta or something :puke

Also, sorry but "SO UGLY!" ??? Non-GT Fiero? Sorry, not tryin to overtly rip you here but, . . . dude :wtf

[Prince Valiant]

Sorry, but I can't figure out what chrysler you guys are refering to.

The only resembelance I see to anything even remotely chrysler is the "wings" added to the chevy logo.

Otherwise it looks like a first gen camaro with different tailights (that could be construed as "charger-esque" as well I guess). The rear glass, the "coke-bottle" rear fenders that were the rage of the time, the front end, headlights, etc...all remind me of a 67 camaro.

IF they built it, I seriously doubt it would look as wild as this version. larger wheel gaps, less curvacious fenders with more dimunitive flares, sensible wheels/tires.

I don't see why not though....it would give them the platform they need for serious performance, but is flexible enough to function as a decent car that has greater/broader daily driver appeal so that people would buy more of the v6 models/lower level models, and there for justify the development cost

[FiErO-5spd]

Also, sorry but "SO UGLY!" ??? Non-GT Fiero? Sorry, not tryin to overtly rip you here but, . . . dude :wtf
No, it's not a v6, and yes they are off the bat ugly, but future tells i have time to fix it ;) and yes, it will be fast if thats what you're trying to get at :tomato

[Poncho]

ick.

sacralidge.

if anything use the most popular things.

what if the taillights were a little like the 78-92 taillights. just for fun I'd like to see that.