PDA

View Full Version : Steelers/Colts crap call verdict is in...



T-Bag
01-16-2006, 05:51 PM
NEW YORK -- The NFL said the referee made a mistake: Troy Polamalu caught the ball.

The league acknowledged Monday that referee Pete Morelli erred when he overturned on replay Polamalu's interception of a Peyton Manning pass Sunday in the playoff game between Pittsburgh and Indianapolis.

Mike Pereira, the league's vice president of officiating, said in a statement that Morelli should have upheld the call, made with 5:26 left in Pittsburgh's win over the Colts.

After the reversal, the Colts went on to score a touchdown and a 2-point conversion, cutting the Steelers' 21-10 lead to 21-18. That led to a wild final few minutes and Pittsburgh clinched its win only when the Colts' Mike Vanderjagt missed a 46-yard field-goal attempt.

On the play, Polamalu made a diving catch of Manning's pass, tumbled with it in his hands and got up to run. When he did, he fumbled the ball, then recovered. Colts coach Tony Dungy challenged and Morelli ruled Polamalu had not completed the catch.

About a dozen TV and scoreboard replays indicated otherwise. Had the call stood, the Steelers would have had the ball at their own 48 with an 11-point lead.

"The definition of a catch -- or in this case an interception -- states that in the process of making a catch a player must maintain possession of the ball after he contacts the ground," Pereira said.

"The initial call on the field was that Troy Polamalu intercepted the pass because he maintained possession of the ball after hitting the ground. The replay showed that Polamalu had rolled over and was rising to his feet when the ball came loose. He maintained possession long enough to establish a catch. Therefore, the replay review should have upheld the call on the field that it was a catch and fumble.

"The rule regarding the performing of an act common to the game applies when there is contact with a defensive player and the ball comes loose, which did not happen here."

The NFL almost never makes public the result of its reviews, although it did three years ago, when Pereira said officials should have called pass interference against San Francisco on the final play of a wild-card game with the New York Giants. The correct call would have given New York a second chance to kick a game-winning field goal in a 39-38 loss.

After the game, Pittsburgh linebacker Joey Porter said of the ruling:

"I know they wanted Indy to win this game; the whole world loves Peyton Manning. But come on, man, don't take the game away from us like that."

NFL spokesman Greg Aiello had no comment on Porter's statement.

In the past, players who have made such statements have been subject to fines.

I agree 100% with Porter. As conspiracy theoryish as it sounds, the refs were against the Steelers with a bunch of OBVIOUS bad calls. This guy better not show his face in Pittsburgh or at another Steelers game again.

The replay system has to be revamped now

Yooformula
01-16-2006, 06:05 PM
its not the system so much as it is too much descision power in a single judge's hands. In order for a judge to overrule the original call, the booth and all judges should confer, JUST to be sure otherwise, it shouldnt be challenged. In the very least, when a challenge is called, more than 1 person should decide or at least concur.

srt4eh
01-16-2006, 06:13 PM
at least the steelers still won

wikked
01-16-2006, 06:50 PM
I haven't heard anyone who didn't think it was a catch.
Those obvious bad calls should have some kind of penalty for the ref, suspension/fine/kick in the nuts.

theavenger333
01-16-2006, 06:58 PM
thats the dumbest thing i've ever heard, the league being against a team. they call it the way they see it. yes, he blew the call, it happens, heaven forbid human error. as for penalizing refs, yes SOMETHING needs to be done, but you can't fine a ref for doing what he thinks is right, which is his job. it will make them second guess themselves, and look at other things in the game than just what the call actually is.

T-Bag
01-16-2006, 07:59 PM
thats the dumbest thing i've ever heard, the league being against a team. they call it the way they see it. yes, he blew the call, it happens, heaven forbid human error. as for penalizing refs, yes SOMETHING needs to be done, but you can't fine a ref for doing what he thinks is right, which is his job. it will make them second guess themselves, and look at other things in the game than just what the call actually is.


There were at least 4 OBVIOUS bullshit calls/noncalls all against the Steelers in that ****. Maybe I'm just still pissed off about this but damn....

wikked
01-16-2006, 08:25 PM
thats the dumbest thing i've ever heard, the league being against a team. they call it the way they see it. yes, he blew the call, it happens, heaven forbid human error. as for penalizing refs, yes SOMETHING needs to be done, but you can't fine a ref for doing what he thinks is right, which is his job. it will make them second guess themselves, and look at other things in the game than just what the call actually is.

Heh that might fly if there was no instant-replay, but c'mon... that shìt was 100% a catch, and no one agrees with the ref, no one. There's no way they should have overturned it after watching it over & over & over.
Sure it didnt affect the outcome, but jeez.

Silver03SRT
01-16-2006, 08:26 PM
thats the dumbest thing i've ever heard, the league being against a team. they call it the way they see it. yes, he blew the call, it happens, heaven forbid human error. as for penalizing refs, yes SOMETHING needs to be done, but you can't fine a ref for doing what he thinks is right, which is his job. it will make them second guess themselves, and look at other things in the game than just what the call actually is.
I can see human error without a replay. But when you sit infront of a tv screen for a minute and look at 4 differnt camera angles thats just ignorance. It was obivious that he favored Indy. If there were no replay and they said no catch thats one thing but common he watched who knows how many times.

Silver03SRT
01-16-2006, 08:27 PM
Heh that might fly if there was no instant-replay, but c'mon... that shìt was 100% a catch, and no one agrees with the ref, no one. There's no way they should have overturned it after watching it over & over & over.
Sure it didnt affect the outcome, but jeez.
I guess you and I think alike. :thumbsup

theavenger333
01-16-2006, 09:12 PM
believe me, i agree, but remember, there are some people who do'nt see things the same way. the ref was at fault, he is a dummy, but u can't penalize him for that unless its obvious he was throwing the game to one side

jersyboyy
01-16-2006, 10:21 PM
Steelers Won Cheaaa So Who Cares about that gay call!!!!!!

T-Bag
01-16-2006, 10:36 PM
Steelers Won Cheaaa So Who Cares about that gay call!!!!!!
That fact is that it almost COST them the game, as the Colts scored on the next drive. Every play is crucial in those last minutes. That would have probably been it right there...but who knows with how the rest went.

I'm just glad the better team won, as they deserved to, even after being ****ed with.

97z2801ss
01-17-2006, 11:39 AM
yep NFL refs are horrible

flackjacket
01-17-2006, 03:38 PM
and where do you work? lol. Are you the best at your job 24/7? Just saying they made the call. He explained that in his opinion the player did not complete his football move in that he dropped the ball in the same move as him rolling on the ground. That counted as one move. Thats the point the ref was making. I don't agree or disagree. But saying NFL refs are Horrible is uneducated and rash.

This isnt the WWE....

Yooformula
01-17-2006, 04:26 PM
This thread is sooooooooo dead and beaten already BUT the problem is not so much the play itself. The original call was an interception, the problem is the REVIEW. A ref looked at the replay and decided that. It wasnt heat of the moment during play all hell breaking loose, this moron had time to decide his desicion. Mistakes happen on field during the play all the time, thats expected they are human but when you have the opportunity to review with footage not available to everyone else and take your time to decide.....well now your an idiot for making that call.

Silver03SRT
01-17-2006, 05:52 PM
If this cost them the game which it didnt then the ref should be fine/fired. The point is that the ref is a professional and its his job to make the correct call which he didnt. He gets paid to call a game even. There were a few other questionable calls that could ahve been called, like the pass interference earlier in the game.